Showing posts with label Pleasant View Bible Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pleasant View Bible Church. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 16, 2019

Theology of Family 1: The Family as a Concert of Love, Submission, and Authority

Theology of Family 1: 
The Family as a Concert of Love, Submission, and Authority

1 Cor 11; Eph 5:22-6:4

Thesis: Gender roles in the family are under attack in our culture on every front.  The Bible does affirm gender roles as rooted in creation and in God’s good plan for our good and His glory.  Biblical gender roles are defined in scripture.  While self-sacrificing love is most closely associated with the husband, submission with the wife, and obedience with children, these adjectives do apply to other roles as well.  When Biblical roles within the family are followed and embraced, the family becomes a concert of love, submission, and authority which glorifies a good and wise God.


      I.            Introduction (3 min)
A.   3 Views: Heirarchicalism, Egalitarianism, Complementarianism
B.    The analogy of Knife and Chainsaw
   II.            Are Gender Roles In the Family Really Necessary? 1Cor 11:2-16 (20 min)
A.   Background:
1.      1 Cor is a problem-solving letter. Paul is addressing specific issues within that church that have come to his attention.
2.    One such problem is that women, enjoying their equality with men before the Lord as fellow heirs of salvation (Gal 3:28), have been behaving as if they are not under the authority of their husbands when in church.
3.    Also addressed in 14:33-36; 1 Tim 2:12.
4.    Paul addresses this specific question here, but we may draw general principles from it.
B.    Thesis (vs 3, 10): Women and men have different roles within the family based on their gender.

3 But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.

10 That is why a wife ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.

1.      The point is that there is order in the Christian Home and in the Church. 
2.    Headship has multiple aspects:
a)    Source (Gen 2)
b)   Over 50 uses in Koine greek literature always implies authority.
c)    Has nothing to do with personal worth or value.
3.    Christ’s headship serves as an example and limiter to man’s.
a)    Headship used between the Father and the Son in this passage demonstrates that it is not necessarily based on the superior nature of one person over the other (Phil 2).
b)   Eph 1:22
c)    Col 1:18
d)    Eph 5:23-24
4.    Male Headship is the purpose and plan of God from the beginning, evidenced in Creation.
5.     Women, while equal in standing before God in the sense of worth and salvation, are called to submission as an organizational necessity.
6.    While physical symbols of male headship and authority may be temporal and cultural, the need for them is trans-cultural and divinely intended.                                     
C.    Three Examples
1.      Vs 4-5: Head Coverings: Contextualizing the thesis in Corinthian culture
a)    Women wore veils as a sign that they were married.
b)   Unmarried women (prostitutes?) Did not wear veils.
c)    Men covering their heads would have been men abandoning their office of head in their homes and in the church.
d)    Women who threw off their veils in the church were declaring themselves free from their husband’s authority, which was dishonoring to him and to God’s order.
e)    Not a Jewish cultural application: Male priests had to wear a turban or hat in order to serve the Lord.
f)      Interesting that in Jewish culture, Men covering their heads to pray would very shortly (by 130 AD) be normative (Tallit). It had not yet begun.
2.    Vs 6, 14-15 Long/short hair. Contextualizing the thesis in a more universal sense.
a)    Men of almost every culture wear their hair shorter than women of that same culture.
b)   Some notable exceptions:
(1) Nazarite Jews: Odd on purpose to stand out as people who were under a vow.
(2)                        Native Americans & other aboriginal people who see long hair as a mystical connection with the spiritual world.
c)    Vs 6: Shaving of the hair of a woman was a sign of loss and shame (Deut 21:12).
d)    Vs 6 Hyperbole argument is similar to Gal 5:12.
e)    Vs 14-15 In almost every culture, men have realized that the labor to which a man is called is more easily done with short hair and that the beauty of a woman is enhanced by long hair. 
(1) Humorous example in Absolom
(2)                        Nature itself teach you.  Not that we have this inherent knowledge at birth or that nature somehow instructs us, but it is everywhere evident.
(3)                        Hair as a covering.  A “natural veil” from their contextual viewpoint.
3.    Vs 7-9 Biblical precedent based on Creation. 
a)    Notice that this passage, which is drawn upon scripture and not contextualized in any way, does not restate the specifics of hair or veil.
b)   In Gen 2:18-25, the woman is created as a helper for man and is a derivative of his body.
c)    This serves as the ultimate foundation for the argument for male headship every time it is given in scripture.
d)    The image of God is given to the species in Gen 1:27.  We understand that women share in that reality equally with men, but their derivative creative status puts them in a posture of submission from the beginning.
e)    God does not curse creation because of the woman’s sin but because of man’s.  Man’s sin is referenced in every discussion of the fall as being the lynchpin of the curse. His failure to be her head is what God curses.
(1)      Gen 3:17
(2)                        Romans 5:12-14
4.    God restates the thesis in the midst of this Biblical argument, but doesn’t mention the veil directly:
a)    “Symbol of authority on her head.” ESV
b)   More literally: “A wife ought to have authority over her head.”
c)    A call to male headship over his wife, not a call for a veil.
D.   Corrective counterpoint (vs 11-12).
1.      While women were created as a derivative of men, all men are born of women, so they are naturally interdependent.
2.    God is the source of them both (Gen 1:27).
3.    Don’t take this argument for male headship to mean that men are naturally superior to women.  The organizational position does not reflect innate worth or value (1Pe 3:7).
III.            What are the Roles In the Family? Eph 5:22-6:4 (5 min)
A.   Excellently discussed in Mike’s Sermon on this topic on 9/15.  Listen to that if you missed it.
B.    Wives (vs 22-24).  Submission out of worship to Christ.
1.      Submission is a recognition of Christ’s worthiness, not their husband’s.
2.    Submission to the husband’s authority is not absolute.  If he commands something sinful or against scripture, submission to Christ is supreme.
3.    Also, we should note that female submission is only applied in the home and in church.  There is no call for all women everywhere to submit to all men everywhere and in every context.
C.    Men (vs 25-33)
1.      Leadership is others-oriented.  Not selfish. The first example of headship is giving oneself away.
2.    The goal of Biblical headship is to sanctify the family.
3.    Regarding children (6:4), headship is to be exercised winsomely and without frustrating them.
D.   Children (6:1-4). Obedience is required for several reasons:
1.      It pleases the Lord (worship)
2.    It increases the quality of a child’s life.
3.    It sets a course of righteousness that, over time, dictates the health of a culture.  In the case of Israel, this insured their ability to stay in the land (Deut 32:19-22)
IV.            Are the Roles Rigidly Defined? (5 min)
A.   Is it true that only Husbands love sacrificially, that only wives submit and that only children ever obey? Certainly not.
B.    Biblical examples of exceptions:
1.      God uses four women to save the life of and shepherd Moses (his mother, his sister, Pharoah’s daughter, and Zipporah). Ex 4:18ff is an interesting read!
2.    The proverbs 31 woman engages in commerce and agriculture of her own accord to bless her household.
3.    Abagail stepped in to save the life of her foolish husband Nabal (1 Sam 25).
C.    There are times when one marriage partner is going to have to cover for the other.  That’s part of the give-and-take of a good marriage. 
D.   However, the norm should be the fulfillment of regular gender-based roles in the family.
   V.            An Apologetic for fulfilling gender roles within the family (12 min)
A.   Our culture is pushing against the traditional roles of men and women within the family because of legitimate problems that have happened when these roles are abused.
B.    According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence:
1.      1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men have experienced domestic violence.
2.    15% of all violent crimes in the state of IN in 2014 were domestic violence cases.
3.    75% of all murder-suicides in the US are domestic violence situations.  94% of the victims of those crimes were female.
C.    When natural male leadership is divorced from the Biblical mandate to shelter, love, and protect selflessly and is instead infused with selfishness and pride, the result is not a peaceful, harmonious home, but violence and death.
D.   This does not constitute an argument against gender roles, though. 
E.    When a system is not executed correctly and fails, you don't say the system is broken.  The failure is not the system’s.  The failure resulted because the system was not followed.
F.    For some, gender issues are “the issues” that cause them to separate from the church. 
G.   GK Chesterton: “Christianity has not been tried and found lacking.  It has been found difficult and left untried.”
H.  Because of the false perception of the failure of gender roles in marriage, the clear teaching of scripture is being overturned.  “After all, it’s 2019!” 
1.      Gender questions: 12% of all respondents in a representational survey of Millenials in California identify as “gender non-conforming.”
2.    Liberal and liberal-leaning mainline denominations are increasingly ignoring biblical gender roles in both the home and the church.
3.    Homosexuality, which is a different but allied question, is increasingly being affirmed by many churches.
4.    Cohabitation rates drastically increased in the last 30 years.  Fewer people getting married or choosing to marry later after cohabitating for a while.
5.     A study of divorces asked divorcees if they would have characterized their marriage as “traditional” or “non-traditional.”  Non-traditional marriages divorce more than twice as frequently.
6.   “Through my research, I have discovered that women who prefer the modern/non-traditional marriage, usually end up divorcing their spouse due to unresolved conflicts in their marriage. Sometimes, being Mrs. Independent leads to being Miss Independent.”
I.      When we confuse gender and gender roles, especially in marriage, things get messy and confusing.
1.      Certainly, marriage is hard work, and Biblical marriage takes no less effort. 
2.    However, when both parties are submitted to Christ, His Word and His Spirit are available to lend strength, purpose, and hope to the labor of love that marriage requires.
J.     Knife, Chainsaw reversal.
K.   Parts in an orchestra.
L.    When the family is functioning properly, there is a beautiful harmony of each one serving and loving the other.  It becomes a concert of Love, Submission, and Authority.

Saturday, March 2, 2019

Jesus in the Old Testament 01: Permission to Proceed


Jesus in the OT 1: “Permission to Proceed”

Thesis: Jesus Himself taught that the OT was about Him in its theology and contained Him in its History. His example is our template as we go forward in this study.

You can watch a video of the lesson here.  It was my first attempt at live-streaming, and it shows.  The next one will be better!



  1. Nutshell: <5 min, with kids
    1. The Bible is a big book! Who can tell me who it’s about?
    2. There are lots of people talked about in the Bible, but it’s not about any of them.  It’s all about Jesus.
      1. John 5:39-40, 45-47.
      2. If we study the Bible and forget that it’s all about Jesus, it does us no good!
      3. People can study the Bible without giving their lives to Jesus.  If they do, it doesn’t help them at all. 
      4. Every time you read the Bible or hear a story, ask yourself, “what does this have to do with Jesus?” He’s in there somewhere.
  2. Deeper
    1. Do we have permission to look for Jesus in the OT?
      1. On to something or on something?
      2. Authorial Intent: Tolkien vs. Lewis
    2. Luke 24: 13-35
      1. Setting: Day of resurrection.
a)    After Women’s discovery, Peter and John’s return to the empty tomb.  Perhaps Mary Magdalene's encounter is happening as they are getting ready to leave. Nobody has yet seen the Lord.
b)    Emmaus: Four possible towns, most probable is El-Qubeibeh
(1)  A Roman road passes by from Jerusalem, 7 miles away.
(2)  Crusaders in 1099 found an old Roman fort named Castellum Emmaus there.  There has been a Christian presence there ever since, Franciscan and Lutheran.
      1. Cleopas, Clopas, Alpheus, Brother of Joseph (Eusebius and Hegesipuus, AD 180). And wife?  Returning to Emmaus after being in Jerusalem for Passover and lingering with disciples.  If so, then Cleopas’s wife has had an angelic visitation, and Cleopas has disregarded his wife’s story.
      2. Vs 15.  Cleopas and his wife were “discussing,” but the verb συζητεῖν can also mean “disputing.”  Is it possible that they were having it out about the status of Jesus’ resurrection?  She is insisting that the angel told her that Jesus was alive, and he was telling her that she was out of her mind?
      3. Jesus appears to his disciples (family?), but they do not recognize him. 
a)    Cf John 20:14-15; 21:4
b)    People don’t recognize Jesus himself post-resurrection.
      1. Vs 17 He uses a milder word to describe their conversation, ἀντιβάλλετε “to throw back and forth.”
      2. Vs 18. Cleopas’ response is both sad (gloomy) and incredulous.  Demonstrative use of ἡμέραις ταύταις, “this very day!?” They had a degree of faith and hope, but it has been dashed by his crucifixion.
      3. Vs 21. “Redeem Israel.” 
a)    OT hope of Messiah (Ps 130:8; Isa 59:20)
b)    Luke frames his work with the hope of the redemption of Israel (cf Luke 1: 16, 54, 68)
c)    Even the Apostles, after the resurrection, got hung up on Jesus’ political revolution (Acts 1:6). 
d)    They missed the distinction between the first and second advents of Christ.
      1. They had reason to believe
a)    Angelic testimony
b)    Scriptural prophecy (although not understood)
c)    Eyewitness accounts, but they didn’t believe the Women
d)    Their problem was a heart issue.  They didn’t believe, which is what Jesus gets to.
      1. Jesus’ response, the ALLs of vs 25-27.
a)    They are not chided for not believing the women.  Not disciplined for doubting the angels.  They should have known and believed the scriptures.
b)    All the prophets (vs 25)
c)    Moses and All the prophets (vs 27)
d)    All the scriptures (vs 27)
e)    Everything in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms (vs 44)
      1. “The greatest sermon never recorded” in vs 27!  It’s all about Jesus.
      2. They finally saw him, in vs 31, in the breaking of bread.
a)    It was still Passover, the Festival of Unleavened bread (Sunday, day 3 of Passover that year). They would only be eating unleavened bread that night.
b)    It would have looked and sounded just like the celebration of the Passover over which Jesus presided on Thursday night. Luke 22:19).
c)    Their eyes were opened when they remembered what Jesus had said then and subsequently accomplished, in light of Jesus’s sermon on the road.
      1. Veiled and Opened:
a)    Closed eyes (vs 16) and eyes were opened (vs31) passive voice.  They had nothing to do with their eyes not recognizing Jesus. The action lies outside them. (Lk 9:45; 18:34)
b)    Regarding the law (2 Cor 3:12-16; Rom 11:25)
c)    Spiritual eyes opened to physical realities (Num 2:31; 2 Kings 6:17)
d)    Only through the action of God can minds be opened (vs 32, Matt 13:13; Mart 4:12; Luke 8:10; 1 Cor 2:6-16; John 6:44)
e)    Once the eyes are opened, they understand (vs 31-32, vs 44-46). Recognition is active, in contrast to the passiveness of their eyes being opened or closed. 
    1. A quick tour of all of the sermons in Acts reveals that the early church always preached based on the OT sermons, which spoke clearly enough about Messiah to make them accountable and lead to a desire for repentance.
    2. The scriptures from which the HS used the apostles to draw in their own writing were only ever OT scriptures.  These had rich teachings about Christ latent in them.
      1. The prophets and angels have longed to understand scripture this way: 1 Pet 1:10-12
      2. Romans begins and ends with this message
a)    Rom 1:1-3
b)    Rom 16:25-27
      1. The cannon closes with this message: Rev 19:10
    1. Where’s Waldo parallel. 
      1. You have to know what Waldo look like in order to find him in the pictures.
      2. We who know Christ can look through the OT scriptures and find him there, while others, who don’t know Him, will not.
    2. Where we’re going from here:
      1. We have the permission of the Grand Author and Subject of all scripture to read him in everywhere that it shows itself as appropriate to do so. Not fantastically, but where there is literary merit or theological importance that can be drawn from the act.
      2. We can follow NT authors to specific examples of Christ in the OT and use their Holy-Spirit inspired interpretation to guide our own.
      3. Three main categories of Christ-in-the OT that we will see:
a)    Allegory or “type”: Something or someone in the narrative makes us think of Christ’s life, person, teaching, or mission and can be seen to cast a new interpretive light on both the OT story and the aspect of Christ it points to:
(1)  The Ark in the flood
(2)  The Bronze Serpent
(3)  The Rock that is struck
b)    Prophecy: Direct, concrete, statements that literally point to a verifiably Christological truth.  These are either:
(1)  About his first advent, and therefore already fulfilled
(2)  About his second advent, and therefore yet-future.
c)    Christophanies: Where Christ himself shows up in a pre-incarnational manifestation and interacts with men.
(1)  Angel of the Lord
(2)  The “Man” who speaks to Abram about Isaac and the judgment of Sodom and Gomorrah.
(3)  Melchizedek?
      1. Rather than dealing with these OT elements topically, we will deal with them chronologically, starting next week in Gen 1.



Wrap-Up Questions: In the next 10 minutes, discuss in Family units or small groups.
  1. Before tonight, how would you have described how you looked at the Old Testament?
  2. How does Jesus’ claim that all of scripture is about Him change the way you see the Old Testament?
  3. Are there passages that you have skipped or not enjoyed reading because you thought that they were not applicable to you?  If so, how might you view these parts of the Bible in light of tonight’s teaching?
  4. In both passages we looked at tonight, Jesus was upset at people for not believing the entire Bible. Are there any parts of the Bible that you think are hard to believe or understand?  If so, what does tonight’s lesson do to your view of those parts of scripture?
  5. Fathers/Group Leaders: Lead your group in a short prayer asking God to open your minds to the truths of his Word in general and any difficult passages in particular.